TCL’s Nxtpaper 4.0 screen: A review

When we buy an electronic device, the normal thing (I want to believe) is to choose the most balanced model within the price range available to the purchase.

Let's take a phone as an example. There's no point in having the best camera in the world if the system crashes or the battery can't keep up with your routine. Or a computer that has a wonderful keyboard but a terrible screen.

Last December, I bought a tablet just because of its screen. The other specifications? I didn't even look at them. I wanted to see with my own eyes that screen, promised by the manufacturer as almost magical, combining the visual comfort of E-Ink screens with the speed and smoothness of LCD.

Today, I'll talk about it: TCL's Nxtpaper Tablet 11 gen. 2 and its Nxtpaper 4.0 screen.

(more…)

Motorola and GrapheneOS announce long-term partnership

For several months, the maintainers of GrapheneOS, an alternative, security and privacy-focused version of Android, had been talking about a partnership with a major manufacturer. On Monday (2nd), at the Mobile Web Congress (MWC), we found out who the partner is: Motorola Mobility.

(more…)

This app alerts you when it detects Meta camera glasses nearby

With the success of Meta's camera glasses, there is now a risk of being recorded without consent or knowledge and ending up exposed in a crude video on TikTok or Instagram.

The manufacturers claim that a subtle light on the frame indicates when they are filming. It is not always easy to see the light, and anyway it is trivial to disable it.

(more…)

The new version of Nova Launcher, a popular launcher for Android, brought an unwanted new feature: advertising trackers from Meta and Google. On Exodus, a non-profit app auditing platform, you can see the changes from the previous version (8.1.6) to the new one (8.2.4).

Nova Launcher was purchased by Sweden's Instabridge a few months after the launcher's creator left Branch, the company that bought the app in 2022 and promised to open its code — which never happened. Instabridge has confirmed that it is testing ads in Nova Launcher and that it will not display ads to those who have Nova Prime (paid version).

Oto Music, the best mp3 player for Android

If you plan to listen to music files like I do, but your phone is an Android, Oto Music is the best option I've found for this OS.

Oto Music's proposal is to adhere to Android conventions. Hence its look is well integrated with the Google OS, its support for Chromecast standard, and beautiful widgets. And, of course, all the features you would expect from a music player.

The attention to detail by Piyush Mamidwar, the app's creator, is noticeable. This is evident in the app's small size, only 5 MB. How can so much fit inside!?

Oto Music has some of the highlights of Doppi, my choice for iOS, such as an equalizer and synchronized lyrics search. And it goes further: it has a sleep timer and a powerful metadata editor.

It's free, available on the Play Store, with a one-time purchase that unlocks some extra features, such as support for multiple artists and genres in one song, various visual customizations, and a 10-band equalizer. (I just couldn’t fine the price. Can anyone see it?)

Sideloading is fundamental to Android and it is not going away. Our new developer identity requirements are designed to protect users and developers from bad actors, not to limit choice. We want to make sure that if you download an app, it’s truly from the developer it claims to be published from, regardless of where you get the app. Verified developers will have the same freedom to distribute their apps directly to users through sideloading or through any app store they prefer.

You’re going to use Gemini on Android whether you like it or not

Google sent an email to Android phone owners warning that Gemini “will soon be able to help you use Phone, Messages, WhatsApp, and Utilities on your phone, whether your Gemini Apps Activity is on or off.” The change is scheduled for July 7th.

The notice generated confusion even in Android-focused publications. — 9to5Google, Android Police, Android Authority. Even after clarifications, including a statement from Google itself, the whole thing remains… confusing.

From what I understand, if Gemini Apps Activity is disabled, Gemini will continue to be available and have access to the mentioned apps, including WhatsApp and Phone. The difference is that interactions with the AI won’t be recorded in the history and will be stored by Google for up to 72 hours, with the guarantee that they won’t be used to train AIs or reviewed by humans.

(In other words, leaving history enabled subjects interactions to AI training and reviews by other humans.)

Those who *really* don’t want Gemini meddling with calls, messages, WhatsApp, and system settings need to disable integrations with each app within the Gemini app itself. Which seems to be another thing, different from Gemini Apps Activity. I presume it’s this app.

The aforementioned specialized publications, after updating their stories to “clear up the confusion,” concluded that the net result of the change is positive for people’s privacy. I’m not so sure about that. Confusions of this type, which sound intentional and try to hide the “nuclear” toggles (that disable the offered feature), tend to be defeats for privacy. And I won’t even get into the merits of whether Gemini snooping through my messages is good or bad.

Or maybe I still don’t understand it properly.

Related link (I think?): the extensive Gemini Apps privacy center.

What’s the deal with SafetyCore, the weird app that suddenly appeared on Android?

Does your phone run Android? If so, you might have noticed a new app called SafetyCore. Announced by Google in October 2024, the company has been rolling it out recently (at least here, in Brazil).

SafetyCore is designed for devices running Android 9 or later, takes up about 2 GB of storage, and according to Google “provides common infrastructure that apps can use to protect users from unwanted content.” The documentation also notes that “the classification of content runs exclusively on your device and the results aren’t shared with Google.”

Almost no one reads these docs or even warnings, alerts of an app. What definitely catches your eye is a new icon among your apps that seems to appear overnight. Is SafetyCore something to worry about?

It’s published on the Play Store and, like any other app over there, it gets ratings and comments. Its average rating is 3.5, with the highest (5) receiving the most votes overall and the lowest (1) not being insignificant in number. One standout negative comment sums up the problem (in Portuguese, here translated):

“The app installed on its own and when I tried to open it, it just showed the app info. I’m not sure if it’s legitimate or not, and that worries me and many other consumers, breaking our trust in the security of the operating system. A quick question: if the app is legitimate, is it supposed to have an icon and do something, or is it supposed to be hidden? Like, for example, Google Play Services.”

If I had to sum the issue up even more, I’d say that the way SafetyCore was released is an example of a lack of transparency and a disregard for user autonomy. No matter how good Google’s intentions may be — which, judging by the history of big tech, is far from a guarantee — this isn’t the right approach.

Apple isn’t off the hook either. At the end of December 2024, someone noticed a new option in Apple Photos: “Enhanced Visual Search,” on by default. It identifies the location of photos even when there are no geo location in the metadata, by recognizing landmarks in the images. The documentation explains that it “works without sending your photos or videos to Apple and without Apple learning about the information in those photos or videos.”

In both cases, trust is lost when features like these are enabled quietly, without giving users the option to opt-out — a practice that remind what malicious parties would adopt if their intention were installing malware on millions, even billions, of devices.

What’s frustrating is that these are promising features that seem like good ideas. Scanning for unwanted or malicious content on your device without sending data to Google’s cloud? A real step forward, if true. Improving photo search without handing over your images to a big tech company? Sounds great.

However, note that both promises are extremely difficult to verify since all the code is closed source. That alone is a huge red flag. Enabling these features by default without any notice only worsens the situation.